WASHINGTON (AP) - Last year, proponents of limiting partisan politics in the creation of electoral districts needed to win over Justice Anthony Kennedy. They couldn't.
The issue is back before the Supreme Court again, with arguments on Tuesday, and it might be harder than ever to convince the justices to rein in the practice known as partisan gerrymandering, designing districts to benefit one political party.
A new round of redistricting awaits after the 2020 census, and the court's decision could help shape the makeup of Congress and state legislatures over the next 10 years.
With Kennedy retired, the question is whether federal courts will remain open at all to complaints about political line-drawing.
- Supreme Court to hear redistricting challenge
- Supreme Court Renders No Definitive Ruling on Partisan Redistricting Cases
- Supreme Court rejects challenges to silencer laws
- Supreme Court won't hear Trump bid to end DACA program
- Supreme Court hears biggest Second Amendment case in a decade
- Push to remove redistricting from Oregon Legislature inspires ballot initiatives
- Supreme Court Upholds Trump Travel Ban
- Supreme Court Lets Military Implement Transgender Restrictions
- Supreme Court Blocks Louisiana Abortion Clinic Law
- Oregon Supreme Court OKs Language in Gun Control Proposal